or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by CGJ

That's because the MacBook Pro and Mac Pro still use Apple's old 4-on-1-line marketing.Example A: http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/Whereas the iPhone uses a 3-on-1 line marketing page: http://www.apple.com/iphone/However, they are now moving to 2-on-1 line marketing: http://www.apple.com/ipad/ and http://www.apple.com/macosx/mountain-lion/EDIT:// This is how I see it anyway *shrug*
I'd agree with Skil. I've clicked on 'MacBook Air' because I want to buy a MacBook Air. If I want product info I either scroll down or go to the MacBook Air webpage, I don't need another round of adverts.
Actually, in Two and a Half Men, he is a great Apple advocate. He Facetime's on his iPhone 4 and iMac, and he's always 'coding' on his MacBook Air.
Weird thing is...That's all that is on my Photo Stream.
Nah, with two Brits as Senior Vice Presidents, they'll end up merging with the Falkland Islands.
My friend is on the 3 network, he loves how fast the 3G network is. ... On those rare occasions when he can get signal.
How on Earth can they say they want to give all MPs iPads when Parliament doesn't even have useable Wifi?!I was having work experience at Parliament last summer, and even the IT technicians failed to connect to Wifi anywhere outside the central lobby or committee rooms. It doesn't work in the Commons, Lords, or even the terrace (a bar overlooking the River Thames).With all that said, it will be good to see an end to those horrible Windows 7 machines they have stuck...
I still don't see why Apple doesn't automatically give people 3 years of warranty + 1 year of phone support, and just use AppleCare to extend them both to 5 years. Kinda gives you a better feel of 'our computers last longer.'
Ah, but will it blend?
Buyback is good, gives shares to hard-working employees who grow the business. Dividend's are bad, gives rich 'investors' even more money; even though they don't contribute at all to the way Apple is run. It's like a sportsman paying the owner of the sports club, as opposed to the owner paying the sportsman. Surely, going from $370 in October 2011 to $590 in March 2012 is enough money for these 'investors'. Dividends are for companies with no room for growth, like...
New Posts  All Forums: