Question for you conspiracy theorists:
Was it wrong in any way for Google, seeing the future of mobile ushered in by the iPhone, to shift the focus of the UI/UX quickly (and work out kinks later) to not be left behind?
Quote:Originally Posted by JeffDM I'm puzzled why he wasn't forced off sooner. I can't think of anything, even saving face doesn't fit very well, because billions of dollars at possible risk trump saving face, as far as I'm...
Quote:Originally Posted by sr2012 Still Schmidt should have been sued to oblivion for obvious conflict of interest. Board Of D-rectums Fail.
Sued for what? Android was already Google's by the time he was ASKED to be on the board. It...
Quote:Originally Posted by JeffDM I doubt that happened though. There is some irresponsibility in allowing him on the board, knowing Google bought Android a year before, but I don't think there is necessarily any wrongdoing like you...
Quote:Originally Posted by renner.david.b Ditto, Can't imagine why Apple has not sued Schmit (aka S_h_it) for breach of contract. There has got to be terms in the Board of Directors agreements which prohibit the theft of company...
It would fit with their recent statements at their and Verizon's horrible press conference...
though I'm sure it was accelerated due to their patent losses.
Quote:Originally Posted by hill60 Remember when the first Android phone launched in the US, it didn't have multi-touch, that came later, first in Europe then in the US.
Why was that, do you think?
Score:-
Apple and Microsoft patents...
Quote:Originally Posted by Macnewsjunkie I guess I am the only person who thinks that companies are spending money litigating and defending patents is not a waste of time and money. Technology patents are not simple ideas that can...
Quote:Originally Posted by Tallest Skil Maybe, but no.
Of course not.
Hardly.
Qualify something...or better yet, what did Android 1.0 steal from iOS and also why did it take Google almost 2 years after the iPhone announcement...