or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Corrections

 Yes, Google is shooting the moon 24/7! What does it have to show for it? A group of devoted fanbots praising the company in the comments section of the Verge! And nothing but revenues from the same PC web ads its been relying on since it was founded. Apple is building an ecosystem and platform. Google is introducing exciting new strategies every year that are abandoned and replaced the next year. Google doesn't even have a copycat Android tablet platform, just a stretched...
  As the article clearly points out: the last time Bluebox pointed out a major design failing in Android's security architecture, there was malware in the wild within the month.  You lob personal attacks at the author, but the real issue is Google's sloppy work and the difficulty of fixing things in the "open paradise" that is Android. That, and the droid groupies who makes excuses for the company and its half baked products.
If you want to hear more about how IDC invents its figures to achieve a particular number, you can read the ex-IDC analyst describing how in the reI know you are a troll account, but "Apple spokesman Steve Dowling confirmed Monday that the growth was double digit (i.e. 10% or more) in each of those markets" - Fortune.  Go back under your bridge.
And Motorola is winning by making all the BlackBerrys. And Windows Phone is winning because its on every Lumina. And there are some Lumina phones with really high resolution cameras! And Surface is winning as the Windows hybrid-tablet that isn't an actual notebook. Except that nobody is buying those things and they aren't profitable. 
Tom Kaneshige writes absolute garbage for CIO. An entire article about iPhone & BYOD that failed to even mention IBM, after a previous article that said Apple and IBM couldn't possbilly work together and that Apple has done nothing to support Enterprise MDM. Except that Apple has made enterprise MDM a major feature since iPhone 2.0 in 2008.   He's pushing BlackBerry so hard that its painful to read. All based on "stats" by one anonymous source at an unnamed company that...
 It's nothing short of a cowardly character assassination to sit in the comments passing out accusations of copious "inaccuracies" without stating what any of these are, then represent a conversation where you stuff words into the authors mouth--without any specifics whatsoever--and complain how difficult this process is as the reason why you can't say anything other than what a terrible person in general the author is, because looking up the facts is so time consuming....
The first editorial to appear on AI was last March. So no, you could not possibly look back on "some from a couple of years ago."Busted.
 Describing some possible solution to an existing problem does not change the fact that there is a clear, recognized problem with actual existing software that is widely known about and already being exploited in the real world. You asked, "What do you mean by 'assumes apps won't be bad?'" and then I gave you an answer. Why run to change the discussion to be about how one can indeed assume apps can be bad, while ignoring the clear and obvious corollary that Google allowed...
New Posts  All Forums: