or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by EricTheHalfBee

I'm on mobile so can't link directly.The thread is "Why did Microsoft port Office to iPad". You claimed there were several better alternatives for Android. I asked you THREE times to list them.So I'll ask a 4th time. List all the Android suites better than Office.
You better believe you understand. All trolls understand what I meant.Now, shall I bring up the numerous times I asked you to back up claims you've made? Or are you going to continue being a coward and run away when challenged?In case you forgot, just ask and I'll even do the work of locating the threads and posting links to the topic at hand.
 When your patent is a non-SEP you're allowed to license it to whoever you want (and charge whatever you want). These Apple patents aren't SEP's, so Apple can do as they see fit. Now Samsung, on the other hand, dropped their SEP's from this case. Good thing too, since they have been under scrutiny by the FTC for their obvious abuse of SEP obligations. Too bad, I hoped Samsung was stupid enough to bring their SEP's up in this case just to see the end result.
 What a joke. First off, the link you provided for the Neonode is wrong. They claim "Nionode N1 was the first mobile where performing a gesture on an image unlocked the device". This is an outright lie. The Neonode never had a gesture on an image. You swiped on the lower edge of the screen to select "yes" (you could not do gestures anywhere on the screen - it was permanently fixed to the lower edge). Secondly, Apple provided the user manual for the Neonode phone to the...
 So easy getting a rise out of a troll. You know how to add numbers, right? You understand Grade 3 math? Then you're all set. I suggest going to a tech blog that gets a large number of users/comments (and that isn't heavily moderated). Engadget is a good example (though any blog will do). Read the following review. When you get to the comments, click on the "Top Comments" to see who got the most votes. You'll see that the majority of them are anti-Apple...
 Not for you. Unless you want to go back and answer the numerous questions I've posed to you that you never bothered to back up. Certain AI members deserve such considerations. You do not.
 This is a key point. Why spend so much $$$ in court fighting over a feature that's "worthless"? As we've seen with Slide-To-Unlock and Samsung's own internal user testing, it's far from useless. In fact, it was the best method  out of all the ones they tried.
 He has mentioned that he's developing an Android App. I can only conclude that it's probably an App for a certain demographic where Android is the dominant platform (perhaps something for his home country of Germany). No App developer wanting to reach the widest possible audience of revenue generating customers would ever choose Android first (or choose to be Android exclusive).
 He wasn't skewed pro-Apple - he was skewed pro-truth. Lately he's been critical of Apple, and I'm not really sure why. I'll reserve judgment for when the trial is over and to hear what his opinions of the verdict are. As to claiming AI "you're only as good as your last decision", that's actually reserved for the Android users/Apple haters on all tech blogs following this. To imply otherwise is to ignore facts (sort of like Android users saying something like "if Apple...
Blah blah blah. Who cares if Google was working on the same ideas. It's IRRELEVANT. All that matters if who has a patent on it. If Google did in fact come up with it earlier, then they are stupid (or incompetent) for not applying for a patent. This happens all the time in the real world - when you have multiple companies all trying to solve various problems it's inevitable that sometimes two people come up with the same idea. However, the first person to patent it is the...
New Posts  All Forums: