Nope, that's a Apple fanboy lie / propaganda. Apple doesn't license its so-called core UX patents. Apple's offer to Samsung in 2010 largely consisted of generic mobile OS / utility patents had nothing whatsoever to do with the recent lawsuits.
Nope, partly.. Samsung also manufactures Qualcomm's snapdragons. http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/07/04/qualcomm.partners.with.rival.samsung.on.s4.processor/ goes on to show that TSMC probably doesn't have the kind of capacity or quality to meet Apple's demand. And Samsung's own Exynos now supports LTE: http://rootzwiki.com/news/_/articles/announcements/samsung-galaxy-note-2-marries-quad-core-exynos-to-lte-in-the-us-all-major-carriers-by-november-r1132
two wrongs make a right.. We are talking about Samsung vs. Apple, not Apple vs Microsoft - though I see Apple more in common with Microsoft than Samsung with Microsoft. Yeah, sure. You just read some headlines and you know everything about Samsung. LOL.
There was no such leak ever. QE provided a summary of the evidence rejected by the court when asked by reporters. Nope, these are for "attorney eyes only." As judge magistrate Grewal noted there is a little reason why this motion should be rejected, considering that "Many third parties to this case have had their licensing agreements disclosed.." http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2012112121031884