Originally Posted by icoco3
Meanwhile, crickets sing joyously over at the Samsung website....
why so anti-Samsung? Samsung is too busy making new iPad's display / Cpu / nand - iPad 3 is more like 60% Samsung now.
Originally Posted by digitalclips
I would not be surprised if they are thinking of naming a product an 'iSeoul', but I'd suggest an 'r' would be better than an 'i' .
hate to be nitpicky, but Samsung is based in Suwon, South Korea.
Originally Posted by lkrupp
Yet so far courts have held that they don't have any intellectual property to protect, resulting in not being able to get any injuctions to stick. And to be fair, Apple has had only minor success in...
Originally Posted by anantksundaram
Although, Judge Annabel (I don't know why I love that name!) hasn't worked out very well for Samsung so far....
Judge Annabel's injunction was overturned by a higher court in AU.. She may...
Originally Posted by uguysrnuts
I'm so disgusted by this company, I am seriously considering taking down my Samsung HDTV if it weren't such a hassle to sell. Unfortunately, I purchased it long before this whole patent war...
Originally Posted by Market_Player
Now would it not make more sense to have suite brought against Apple in a country where the market is the largest, that would in turn cause Apple the most financial heartache ?
Seems odd for...
Originally Posted by Mightymike
Samsung's business strategy is to copy Apple and after being sued, litigate down to what the courts with accept. it's a money maker if you don't loose Apple's $8 billion dollar screen business and...