or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by tooltalk

What? I thought Apple can pick and choose any supplier for their retina display. After all, Samsung is like Foxconn that leverages unskilled workers to assemble displays *created* & *engineered* by Apple, though their manufactring process is somewhat more automated.
only if Apple is able to keep FUD by filing lawsuits against its competitors.
It's either Samsung Series 9 (Hackintosh) or MBA 15".
I'm telling ya all.. Apple is heading Sony way. Apple can't compete with Samsung. (duck)
Yahoo Blackberry
Yeah, and that poor kid is near death now. You see the irrationality of Apple fanbois now?
another hilarious comment. Sure, if Samsung is Foxconn, Apple is Wal-Mart. Apple can't engineer jack - Apple's acquisition of Next, anobit & PA semi notwithstanding. Again, you need to remember that Apple is a glorified marketing company. Wheter you like it or not, it's becoming quite apparent that Apple has to depend more on Samsung for manufacturing and technology. Apple's new iPad for instance is about 50% Samsung. In the longer run, consumers are going to see that...
no need to pay any attention to the fanbois.. in their eyes, everything is Apple copycat
Well, actually Samsung Semi's margin is around 15%; Appliance & Media's margin is razor-thin; while LCD's is sometimes I think in the negative terrotory. I think Samsung Mobile's porfit was also around 15% last quarter. So the net aggregate for the entire company, I think, was around 8 or 9% as of last quarter.I'm guessing that Samsung's mobile's revenue and profit now account for at least 35% or 40% of the entire company (Samsung Electronics). Also compare that to...
LOL! what? Samsung's Galaxy R&D is already covered by Apple? Are you saying Apple with all its magnomity is paying Samsung to develop its own Galaxy lines to avoid anti-trust? man, you fanbois logic is ..
New Posts  All Forums: