Originally Posted by Tallest Skil
"Less money? SU~RE! We'll take less money from you!"
eh? Samsung already makes more money selling their own mobile devices (#1 in SmartPhone sales last quarter and #1 in all...
Originally Posted by joindup
There seems something uncomfortable about outsourcing your screen production to a competitor. Yes, Samsung get paid for the screens, but if they deliberately delayed supply by inventing false...
Originally Posted by jcallows
samsung is just figuring out a way to supply enough retina displays for the ipad and for its own galaxy tablets...
Perhaps Samsung isn't all that interested in making displays for Apple?
Originally Posted by mjtomlin
I don't think so... These are different divisions within Samsung and different people have to answer for their own division's profits. Samsung's display and fabrication divisions are not going to...
Originally Posted by hill60
...and if Qualcomm has already paid the licensing fee in the chips Apple are using?
Why don't you go look up "patent exhaustion", pay particular attention to double dipping.
Originally Posted by LongwoodBob
Apple should pay standard FRAND royalalities just like Microsoft, or Nokia would pay....
Samsung doesn't want to settle because all their defenses will lapse.... meanwhile Apple benefits by...
Originally Posted by tylerk36
Can you say monopoly? Nice try. Can you say samsung? I knew you could. Any one care for a macintosh apple? The world loves apples. One a day keeps the teacher away.
I wonder what Steve Jobs...
Originally Posted by solipsism
The number of patents has no barring as the validity of your patents in a specific case so your argument that Samsung's position is many times stronger holds no water, and that's even before we...
Originally Posted by skateni
Well think it makes sense for Apple to move away from Samsung or else Apple will be sorta of "funding" Samsung "photocopying machines" indirectly
It's also very unlikely that...