Originally Posted by herbapou
I agree but working on both devices is a good idea. I am very pro choice regarding screen sizes.
But Apple isn't. They have to perceive a strong market in order to...
Originally Posted by fallenjt
There's rumor about 13" iPad. No rumor for A7x so far.
So we can talk about imaginary iPad since someone made up a rumor, but we can't talk about what might be powering it,...
Originally Posted by Suddenly Newton
But there is no such thing as an A7X. It makes no sense to talk about desiring a nonexistent CPU.
There is no such thing as a 13" iPad either. Imaginary products may as well...
7.9” iPad? Too small, too cramped, too stupid, too unusable.
I wasn’t wrong. Hopefully you’ll be.
From where I sit, you were very wrong on the Mini. You assume your personal taste is somehow reflected...
Originally Posted by joelsalt
Using these numbers you'd get a iPad "Pro" at 13.9 inches (width) for 1.369 pounds.
A 9.7" screen is 45 sq inches.
A 12.9" screen is 80 sq inches.
That is 80/45 or 1.8...
Originally Posted by Andrew Fields
Whatever happened to not converging though, Tim Cook was making fun of that just a few weeks ago?
Whatever happened to waiting till he actually does something before insulting...
Originally Posted by Ireland
I don't know about that. I see laptop or desktop as way more useful/productive than a 13" iPad, and it loses one of the main advantages of an iPad over a MacBook Air: amazing portability. I'm...