or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Mechanic

 Lol you really have no clue what your talking about .
This poor guy (shmidt) he needs to get back on his meds, the dementia is kicking in.
 Heck look at Ballmer panning the iPhone when it came out.  He was an idiot then too.  Look what he has done since then for Microsoft.LOL.There are unfortunately a lot of executives at companies that really should be doing something else.Funny thing is this guy Chandrasekher in the interview Panned the 64 bit move by Apple and then two sentences later said we are developing our own 64 bit chip too.  LOL. If its not worth it then why is qualcomm doing it too?  What a doofus. 
 He's clueless.  Read hear for the reasons why he is dead wrong: http://www.anandtech.com/show/7335/the-iphone-5s-review/4http://www.realworldtech.com/arm64/http://www.mikeash.com/pyblog/friday-qa-2013-09-27-arm64-and-you.html There are many many reasons why 64 bit is huge and being able to address more than 4 gig of ram is the least of them.  When someone brings up the 4 gig argument it generally means they have no clue what there saying. The people in the above links do.
No not really because now they make samsung modify there devices.  That modification includes newer devices too because if they dont they will find themselves right back in court for the newer devices.  Which Apple is already doing.  Apple has made no bones about it.  Tim Cook put it this way:This is why they go to court.  There not interested in licensing there ideas and ip.  They just want people to quit using there ideas and stealing there ip. Period.
He should be canned. He is an embarrassment to his company and the laughing stock of the tech world.  His salary should be 0.
 Yes they did.  Because the chinese government was hacking into googles search database and also blocking searches.  Here's a good article on the matter:  http://www.businessinsider.com/google-pulls-out-of-china-2010-3
As you so mentioned in your comment that the tests were done off screen with 1080p resolution and with that resolution of course quad cores are going to have an advantage but when on screen  the A7 beats the Adreno 330 in rendering tests and is the only chip to score over 30, in fact 37 fps in GL Benchmark 2.7 T Rex Test.  Notice that the Adreno 330 was only able to manage 26 fps.To quote Anand La Shimpi about this benchmark above: Bold emphasis is mine. Its not a catch up...
 What about 61.75?  Isn't that better? 
 No fragmentation wont be an issue.  Because of fat binaries in X code.  Also because of ARMv8's new ISA, the A7 supports AArch 32bit and AArch 64 bit directly.  Which means to the end programmer and user 32 bit  and 64 bit code can be run separately or both side by side in the A7.   Good explanations here, and very technical here.
New Posts  All Forums: