or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Mechanic

A while back it was revealed during the first samsung/apple court case that Microsoft and Apple agreed to a patent cross-licensing agreement with anti-cloning stipulations (that microsoft would not copy apples hardware) this may be part of that agreement.   http://www.macrumors.com/2012/08/13/apple-has-licensed-ios-design-patents-to-microsoft-agreement-bans-cloning/
Samsung is involving google in this case as there defense saying that they didn't invent these features google did and hence apple should sue google not samsung, which is baloney.  Samsungs phones use touchwiz interface developed by samsung.  The fact that Samsung has already changed some of there interface because of previous trials says otherwise.  Even if they did not invent the infringing parts there guilty because they use them and are still violating a patented item...
Don't forget this recent tidbit :He a criminal lol.Here is a quote from the article at: http://www.ibtimes.com/samsung-chairman-lee-kun-hee-summoned-indias-top-court-face-criminal-charges-over-non-1566776
He's running through the forum with blinders on and fingers in his ears yelling so he can't hear anyone.  Like I said reading comprehension for him must have been something he never learned.
LOL you really don't listen do you.  
You know in your world googles search algorithm that does much the same thing as data detectors but on a larger scale should not be patentable either.  Googles search engine is just links!  You are missing the forest for the trees.  
Another misinformed comment you totally ignore the fact hat its not a hyperlink.  It is looking at plain text and interpreting what it sees as a valid email address.  Its not a hyperlink embedded in a document.  As the article said there are literally thousands of lines of code to achieve this. It is not a simple link.
Again you are wrong.  Data Detectors is not an embedded http link.  It is looking at plain text in a document and creating an action based on what it sees.  Again if you read the article you would know that.  But you keep spewing your stupid comments here with no clue about what the actual function of data detectors does.
You have no clue what your talking about.  Its more than just a link.  If you actually read and understood what was said in the article you would know that.  Reading comprehension must be one of you weak suits.
I don't think any of these analysts let that pesky thing call facts get in the way:).  When you make stuff up from your dreams who can dispute you lol.
New Posts  All Forums: