or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by 9secondko

Not sure what "Dre's" title was at Beats. But I doubt it's "musician." And Apple didn't pay for his music. They paid for a company machine. Kind of an unfair accolade compared to others making their money as musicians. Sure he made some money as a producer. But that's not What Apple bought. And "Beats technology" is basically one mans preferred EQ setting. Hopefully the curation lives up to Cook's expectations and the subscription model is sound
Facts don't matter to some people.The iPhone was years in the making and somehow...android follows in one year...(we all know the boardroom extortion there). And the Apple watch was the worst kept secret for a few years. Zero noise came from the Samsung, Google, or MS camps until The Apple rumors got hot and heavy. Then it was just a rush to be "first" not best. And CarPlay was Apple first as well. Apole sometimes borrows ideas as well. But credit where it's due. And Apple...
Jesse jacksons Trojan horse meeting with cook. Such a small nonsensical demonstration that has little to no merit. I guess Jackson was hoping to record himself on TV again with his vcr... Now if the man would put that effort into actually helping people...
Regardless of their enjoyment of such reprimand, it was sorely needed and embarassing my obvious that they were simply aiming for a one-two punch of degrading Apple and propping up android while gaining clicks for themselves. The fact that the article title was blatantly and admittedly false simply shows there IS NO JOURNALISTIC INTEGRITY in the authors' repertoire.Great job DED. Thorough and factual as always. Glad someone with the ability is willing to take a stand for...
Soooo... No plaintiff exists. Therefore, the lawyers must manufacture one? Okayyy. Didn't know that was legal. Some dirty lawyers grubbing for money from a successful company. Nothing else to see here. The lawyers may as well enter their firm as the plaintiff.
Note to Samsung: The level at which you blatantly mimicked the iPhone form factor (and iPad as well) in addition to patented software features is what is "ABSURD" Thetefore, an absurd amount of money to reconcile is just. Making that much money off of Apple design wasn't yours to begin with. It was Apple's. Now trying to argue that you didn't use an apple logo? Your idiocy is showing. 98 percent plagiarism is still plagiarism. Hope you learn your lesson. Wouldn't be...
Everyone I know that uses android devices doesn't do much with them.The rare Pictures, the txting, phone calls.A bit of email and Internet rarely.Most of these don't know how to use their device half the time.Contrast with everyone I know using iOS. Everyone is glued to their devices and is nearly an instant expert on usage. And these people actually take care of their devices because they CARE about them.THATS saying something.
So lovine prides himself at selling Apple a dream. Ok. Sounds like every other hustler out there. And I fail to see what getting shot or shooting people has to do with helping Apple. But hey... At least they have the capital to do more "street" commercials now. Lessons learned from this interview: Jimmy lovine can talk himself into a dream job at Apple. Way to go, Jimbob! Now let's see something tangibly good come out of this. Please.
I thought that was Cue's job. The reason you see him in areas that are languishing, etc. is because he is Apple's "fixer." When something important falls apart or languishes, he is the Apple go to guy to straighten it out. At least that's how I have understood it over the years.
So... Amazon cuts a deal with publishers to sell books a certain way using a certain business model favorable to Amazon and publishers. And it's Ok with the DOJ.   Apple cuts a deal with publishers to sell books a certain way that's favorable to Apple and publishers... and all of a sudden it's "collusion", "price fixing", etc. according to the DOJ.   Thanks DOIJ... That really clears up the ethics of fairness in business competition.
New Posts  All Forums: