or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by dysamoria

Yes, I did see it coming... Of course Google will install ads on every screen they operate. That's what Google is FOR! Just like Facebook, people think Google is for users. It's not. Users are Google's PRODUCT.
Another perfect example of going too far with unnecessary features. Of course it will be used to collect marketing data. That ALL Facebook is FOR!
Samsung is like a technically skilled and socially defective autistic man. The ability to communicate is there, but something just doesn't connect. But then businesses tend to be socially defective on the average... though some have much better self awareness and less brazen willingness to copy, cheat, and lie to the public while knowing everyone sees through it. Actually, my analogy to autism does autistics a disservice. What's really happening is that Samsung is bold...
Not at all surprised. We didn't evolve with this crap on our faces. Glasses give me eye and head pain on a regular basis.
Yay? I hate the iOS 7 look. It's technically an inferior design. Lots of people agree (and are immediately assaulted by fanboys, and those who love functionless change, upon speaking up).
The USPTO originally rejected software patents. They were forced to accept them by political pressure and lobbying from the computer industry. Don't blame a department for being ruined by the overlying political games of those in power above them.
I suspect that both companies realized that a lot of self-incriminating evidence would come out, detailing their abuse of not only each other's property but also the legal system and patent law itself... which might encourage a more popular movement toward truly reforming it... and of course much money would be consumed and business secrets revealed fighting each other in the open legal system, and have decided to find a way to collude. This way they can keep all the facts...
No, such people want the patent system to make sense and do what it originally was established to do, not be a game playing tool for the super rich corporations to hold over the heads of new businesses and be a barrier to entry for new entities and products. Such people also want the system to protect the inventor, not create money making schemes for trolls and other non-inventing entities that happened to accumulate ownership of a pile of patents they don't use for...
Only one of many reasons subscription will NEVER be a choice I make.
"... to protect user data protection..." ???
New Posts  All Forums: