or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by reefoid

  Doing it "their own way" is what got them into this mess in the first place.  How about doing the "right way" instead?   Also, looks like they have 48 hours to comply, unless Tim Cook gets involved.  From the BBC:  
  Judging from some of the responses in this thread, the reason some of us Brits feel aggrieved is because so far this thread has criticised our judicial system (one of the most respected legal systems in the world), our education system and several other generalised criticisms on the British way of life, all over one poxy court case that in the grand scheme of things means absolutely nothing .  I can imagine the response if we all started stereotyping all of the US...
Nice generalisation.  You're basically writing off one of the world's leading legal systems (that many other countries base their legal systems on, including the U.S.) because you disagree with one judge's decision on one case.  Nice.   Out of curiosity, do you have any legal background at all , or are you just spouting uninformed rubbish?
  That's not evidence, that's just your view of things - one that many will disagree with.     And where in any of that does it state that Schmidt abused his position while on the Apple board?  Nowhere.  I'm not disputing the fact that Android was influenced by iOS, just this crap that it was Schmidt that did it.  Nobody, ever, anywhere or at any time has provided any sort of evidence that this happened, its all just conjecture and hearsay.
Err, maybe because Schmidt did nothing wrong?  Makes me laugh whenever this is brought up.  Please, show me some solid evidence that Schmidt did anything underhand whilst on the Apple board.  And by evidence I don't mean hearsay and the thoughts of paranoid posters on this forum.   People seriously need to stop posting this piece of FUD.
  If laws are different, yes.  The recent UK ruling proved that. And there have been at least two judges that I'm aware of (one in the UK, one in Australia) who have said that court cases in other countries would have no bearing on their decisions.  Seriously, America is not the world's authority when it comes to justice.  The rest of the world (FYI, that's everywhere beyond US borders) have pretty established court systems (you know, like here in the UK).  Also, can I...
You think a decision in an American court (that is still under appeal) can be used as a precedent in other countries?  Good luck with that.
I agree with you there.  Although if I was Mr Hogan, I'd stop talking to the press right now as every time he opens his mouth (most recently just three days ago) he's making that hurdle lower and lower for Samsung.
Nice response, except everything in it is pretty irrelevant.   I'm not an apple hater.  I'm not a fandroid.  I have no emotional attachment to any company, I use the tech that suits my needs.  I just get annoyed when people post rubbish as if it was the truth.  Nowhere in my post did I call anybody names.  If you were offended by my post, maybe you should step away from the internet right now as you seem a little over-sensitive to me.  Or are you just offended because I...
Its not about disproving it.  If they say their study shows 98% iPad usage, I believe them.  However, as with any statistic you have to put it in context, and the context hear means there is going to be a natural bias towards iPad use.   The article headline should read: Apple iPad dominates tablet-based web browsing with 98% share on sites primarily optimised for iPads   Can you seriously not see that Onswipe have a vested interest in this statistic being seen to be as...
New Posts  All Forums: