or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by AnalogJack

 I just used the correct name, probably synthetic sapphire was better though. Just being pedantic because it really is the same chemical composition as Sapphire.
Apple was never going to use artificial sapphire as a standard part of the iPhone. Why? Because it makes not one iota of sense, the incredible extra difficulty of manufacture and usage and for what, a handful of people who demand completely over the top scratch resistance. Perhaps it was contemplated as special limited version that would charge extra, but even then I can't see Apple wanting or needing to bother with that level of pandering. Not when they are already...
 Yes well spotted. Kinda C3POish   (o o   \  -/
Would would happen if Samsung stared Apple down and raised their chip price by 50% seeing as it's a superior quality. Who would blink first?
 This is exactly why I would never buy a Chinese hammer from eBay.
As long as it's applied properly to all companies, it is an excellent idea for governments the world over to tax multi mega million companies at a rate of at least 35%. Provided that these funds go where they ought.
I'd like to see Apple lead the way with green energy in the form of  liquid-fluoride thorium reactor power plant.
It's the Android trolls I feel sorry for.
 But it is not a high end watch is it? It's a computer on your wrist. Having said that it most definitely can be used exclusively as a high end watch and if it is then it would go for 2-3 days.
It is astounding how ugly and crowded the old iTunes interface now looks compared to Yosemite's iTunes.
New Posts  All Forums: