Quote:
Originally Posted by trumptman
What you won't find in there... anything noting the political party.
It's very common for news stories not to mention party affiliation, and even more with mayors.
If you look through stories...
Quote:
Originally Posted by @_@ Artman
YOU use the word Utopian, the right-wing blogging/news/radio/FOX douchebags and yes, even the German press uses the word Utopian.
Ah, yes: "utopian," "in the tank" for obama,...
Quote:
Originally Posted by trumptman
I would recommend adding giant to your ignore list sslarson. He only has one argument to make and it is that you are clueless/stupid and thus are not allowed to even express information. He believes...
Quote:
Originally Posted by sslarson
OK. So we agree then.
We clearly don't. You apparently believe rhetorical games are actually substantive arguments, which is the mark of an ideological consumer.
Quote:
It's simply faster to say...
Quote:
Originally Posted by sslarson
Thank you for that wonderfully empty statement.
Well, of course it seems like an empty statement since you clearly have no clue what the terms you use actually mean. That's cool, though. Maybe you...
Quote:
Originally Posted by sslarson
S.S. isn't a Ponzi scheme because it has no money in the saving account. It's a Ponzi scheme because of its basic structure.
No, social security is not a ponzi scheme because it's not a ponzi scheme.
Ah, "in the tank." The great thing about that phrase is how it puts such a bright spotlight on the complete lack of original thought in the losers who parrot it. It's the kind of phrase that makes you wonder if PR firms use it...
Quote:
Originally Posted by sslarson
... Words mean things...
Apparently only when your cookie-cutter, regurgitated libertarian arguments rely on it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sslarson
the massive Ponzi scheme that it is.
