or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by steveH

You might want to check the launch requirements first.   It takes more deltaV to dump a package into the sun than it would to send the same package out of the solar system.
  Except that you still could either run existing Mac apps in Classic mode, or reboot into OS 9 if a specific application didn't play nicely.   I clearly remember testing 10.0 and able to do some work in 10.1 while using OS 9 for most of it, and being mostly switched away from OS 9 by 10.2. (We were a Mac sea in a very large Unix shop.)   In retrospect, it was a fairly painless transition, since it wasn't an either/or situation; we could switch between the environment...
The policy of charging the family for the bullet used to execute an "enemy of the state" was adopted by the Chinese from Soviet practice.   The Nazis may have done the same, but I'm not positive I recall that correctly.
  And the weight, don't forget that.  
Just how long do you think it would take to list, much less demonstrate 275,000 iPad apps?
I'm on a local school board, and we're extremely interested in the possible smaller iPad model.   Possible lower costs aside, it would be more comfortable for kids in the lower and middle grades to use.
As someone else previously pointed out, component cost is only part of the total product cost.   Depending on the product, it might anywhere from 90% to 2% of the final cost. (Highly-scientific WAG applied to produce the answer.)
Just checked here. Background tasks window toggles by clicking on the button, and command-9 works normally. (2010 MBA, 10.8.2, 10.0.5, etc.)
Take a look at Sandvox; one of its features is conversion of iWeb sites.
I really don't see this as being the case, rather that current devices released today that use it are USB2-class.   Unless the Lightning cable is an active, rather than plain passive device.
New Posts  All Forums: