or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Rayz

What an image!
 Exactly. Apple has never broken out sales number by model, and they never will.
 Or rather than getting an inferior phone, I could just buy a different pair of gloves: http://www.macworld.com/article/1156543/touchscreen_gloves_review.html
 Apple is looking for a system that is convenient so folk have to use it.  So, to unlock my phone, I have to tap the screen to crank up the camera then stand perfectly still with the phone about an inch from my face while it takes the scan. I'm also not sure that the camera that the front camera is going to be good enough to make that work.
 Yes, this is the part that confused me. Given the way the touch id is supposed to work then I'm not sure how that can produce a successful reading, unless the part about reading the subdermal layer is simply to ensure that the finger is alive. While I'm sure that CCC is not making this up, I'm not that sure how relevant it is. To begin with, the equipment and effort required is beyond just about every casual  out most iPhone users will ever encounter. Secondly, this...
 That's a 100,000 people who have not seen the phone and don't know what it's going to cost them, but have ordered it anyway.
Though I've not had cause to try it, I understand that you can dial emergency numbers without unlocking the phone.
I don't think I've seen this much fear in the anti-Apple crowd for quite some time. Bodes well for the 5C. "I can buy two crap phones for the price of a good one." Seriously?
Astounding.   They didn't even change the shape one iota ....  
 Not quite sure what you're implying here. The filing date for the first patent (US8212859) is October 13, 2006The second patent has a priority date of October 13, 2006. So what's wrong with setting the priority date of the second patent to the filing date of the first?
New Posts  All Forums: