or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Rayz

 Er, nothing you have said disproves anything about the 'fair licensing' argument.  An SEP must be licensed under fair and equitable terms and must not be used to blackmail the competition into letting you steal their stuff – which is what Samsung attempted to do. Now, is the RockStar consortium refusing to license the patents under fair and equitable terms?  http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/11/failed-44-billion-bid-for-nortel.html Having watched Samsung having its head...
 The answer is simple: hit-whoring.  Contrary to popular belief, Apple leaks a lot less than it used to. In the good old days, AppleInsider had access to juicy, hard-to-get snippets of information that were surprisingly accurate. Over the past few years, Apple has become ever more secretive, and until a product actually hits manufacturing, pundits have no clue (seriously, no clue at all) about what Apple is up to and what it plans to do in the next couple of years.With no...
 Exactly, and let's not forget that the old apps are still on your Mac.
 I think they learned to ignore the whining in the internet echo chamber, and carry on rebuilding the product until it is better than the one it replaces. In iWorks, a lot of the functionality is gone, and a lot of it has just moved someplace else.  As many many many others have pointed out  the old apps are still on the machine, so you can carry on using them. What amazes me is all the 'professional' iWork users who are losing business because iWorks is no longer a...
Spot on.If this is how they go about product design, then their next watch will have a six-inch screen and a clip-on battery pack.But I think folk are missing the point of this dreadful piece of engineering.Samsung knows it's crap, but they won't know how to build a better one until Apple releases a smart watch. When they end up in court for copying it, then it may help to have a 'first to market' device to wave in the jurors' faces.Or it may lead to lots of png files...
Sounds a lot like the situation with Final Cut ProX: First release, much wailing and gnashing of teeth.  I expect that Apple has torn everything down to the bare essentials so they can rebuild the software from the ground up. The question is, how long will it take them?   I don't have a problem with the rewrite (I don't tend to do a lot of complex stuff on Pages anyway), but as with FCPx and iMovie and Maps, the communication was poorly handled. 
 This is what I find really bizarre. Until last week, no one said that Numbers was a competitor to Excel, or that Pages was suitable for 'heavyweight' document work. Now, after the latest upgrades, all these people have appeared who were using Numbers for serious financial modelling and using Pages to crack out technical books and novels of 500+ pages. And now of course, they can't do that anymore. Where have they been hiding all this time?
 Yup, Apple is swimming in cash, so I hope exercise a little leniency in return for good press.
I'd say they understood Samsung's 'fundamental principles' just fine....
First of all, this notion that 'shareholders own the company' is an urban myth.http://www.directorship.com/stout-shareholders-as-owners/When you buy company, you do so in the hope of a return; there is no legal requirement that states you're entitled to it. You do not get partial ownership in the company; you get the chance to earn some money if the company does well. What you have in your eager hands is a lottery ticket, and having a lottery ticket doesn't mean you own a...
New Posts  All Forums: