or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by w00master

So, Jobs' response that "IT'S YOUR FAULT" good then?Riiiight.By the way, go to CNN.com's homepage...Is that Gizmodo's fault?w00master
Ok... perhaps this is true... but again, my response is that telling a customer/user that: "YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG." isn't exactly putting Apple in the best light either. Again, it's happening to me. Not a big deal for me, but it is hugely annoying and nearly *everyone* I've run into has THE EXACT SAME problem. Now, before you respond to my post... I ask you (and others again) is "YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG" gizmodo's fault? Or Apple's? If you say Gizmodo... then it might...
Here's the problem that I think most of you folks don't understand: Maybe it is a design flaw. Maybe it isn't. (Altho, it does happen to me) However, when the CEO company answers with: YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG. Not exactly the best response. w00master
Yes. Yes it is. w00master
I'm waiting for a retraction from AppleInsider: http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/02...ing_html5.html Most of this article, "Adobe working to sabotage HTML5," are by and large completely false. w00master
That's one chip in many. Sorry, but this "excuse" of GSM, is that... and excuse. That's like saying that after Pentium 1, there's nothing after that. It's an evolution. If Apple really wants to double their hardware sales long term, they will eventually HAVE to look at a carrier outside of AT&T. Eventually, Apple will run out of "new subscribers" and/or switchers. Regardless, the crux of my issue really has nothing to do with VZW or AT&T. My issue is why there are so...
I can promise you that Verizon Wireless (note my use of WIRELESS) is not hurting at all. Their #s are quite good, and yes the Droid is helping them (yes... I know you all here hate the droid, but it is helping VZW very well). By the way, who cares that VZW rejected Apple first? This is business. There's always another day both for Apple and VZW. This happens ALL THE TIME.I'm sorry to tell you that this 4G excuse is a RED HERRING. Why? Backwards compatibility. CDMA LTE...
From the tone of many on here, it sure sounds like there's a lot of pro-AT&T peeps.Qualcomm (and others) have a chip in development that can do both CDMA and GSM. This question once that chip comes out becomes COMPETELY mute.This GSM issue vs. CDMA issue is at best a red herring. Why? Because of LTE. Even with LTE, phones would STILL ALWAYS HAVE TO BE BACKWARDS COMPATIBLE. So, if you are a CDMA carrier, your phones will ALWAYS have to be CDMA compatible. This issue is...
Ok... Now this is bizarre. Can someone really explain to me why it would be SO BAD for Apple to also go with VZW and other carriers? It's better for the consumer AND it's better for Apple (long-term). Why is this such a hard concept for you pro-AT&T people to grasp? Also, this concept of "pro-AT&T" is truly making my head hurt. Why anyone would "support" AT&T is truly beyond my understanding. w00master
Because, despite the fact that the iPhone has good worldwide sales, the truth of the matter is that the majority of iPhones sold are *still* from the U.S. To take this even further then, why deny the LARGEST CARRIER IN THE US the potential to DOUBLE APPLE'S SALES? I'm just amazed that ANYONE would think adding VZW is a bad idea. If you don't like it, then don't buy it. It's that simple. w00master
New Posts  All Forums: