or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Bageljoey

These statements do not fit together very well...
This makes absolutely no sense!  Shareholders own the company and, unless you want to overthrow our entire economic system, they should expect some gain from that.  What good would simply lowering prices do for shareholders?  Sure, it would be nice for customers, but, as a shareholder, why would I want to subsidize other people's purchases of Apple goods? You might be surprised to know that many people own more than a hundred shares, but lets use that as an example...
Quakers have long had a religious objection to swearing and oathing.  It has long been established that they be allowed to "affirm" what is traditionally "sworn" and do so without a bible.  I am quite certain that people of other faiths or no faiths have that same option, though many people just go with the flow.
Oh no! Demand for even the Mini is slacking off¡¡¡
You missed the "same time last decade" part...
::LOL::
It's almost like he really believes that MS could have made the Surface before the iPad if only they had wanted to. It's almost like he believes we will believe him. I find this hard to believe...
 Show me a whole year's pan, and I'll be convinced...:)Anyway, this is great news for Apple, though the total tablet sales are much lower than I would have expected for China.
I imagine I will always be partial to the @mac address I have.  They can change these suffixes every year for all I care, as long as my @mac.com always works...
New Posts  All Forums: