or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by elroth

Hey Deuces - Get a Life. Use your brain - you don't have to adopt a stupid expression that just shows what an idiot you are.
The best test is a 3-way test. Example: use two copies of the lossless, and one copy of the compressed (or one lossless and two compressed). Then try to tell which one is different from the other two. It's a much better test than one-to-one. In a one-to-one, someone may hear a difference, but may not be able to guess which one is the lossless. That would be logged as a failure, when in fact they did hear a difference. On another point, it's been shown (through frequency...
ALL major companies do this - especially technology companies. They still get their two weeks pay (or whatever's in their contracts), but once someone is fired, they can't go back to their company computer. If you can't figure out why this makes sense, I'll fill you in - as soon as you learn that people lose jobs, not loose them.
"trouble causers" should have a hyphen: trouble-causers.
Or Valkyries.
Are you crazy or a troll? Vista costs $500, each Mac OS upgrade is $129. The only reason they number them 10.1, 10,2, etc. is to keep the number 10 in the name. They could easily have named them 10, 11, 12, etc. They are not equivalent to other software makers' point upgrades.
Sounds good, but Apple has gone the other way - they don't want to give you a full size keyboard. The mini keyboard is now the default on iMacs - no home or end keys, no right delete key, no page up or down, and inconvenient smaller arrow keys (and no number pad). You can only get the full-size keyboard with your new iMac online (BTO) from Apple - even the Apple Stores can't sell you an iMac with full-size keyboard! So I doubt Apple is going to put much effort into adding...
Not quite - they didn't test the NEW 3.06 GHz iMac.
If you had to guess, which unit do you think might be noisier? And which one more efficient? And which one might last longer?
I don't see why people can't accept the fact that the iMac is a good deal, compared with the closest similar offerings from Dell and HP. Again, it's for those who want the convenience of a good performing all-in-one computer. If you want to argue that Apple should make an affordable headless Mac, then that's fine (and I agree with you - I don't think they should make a bare bones budget computer, but I'd like a mid-priced tower). That doesn't take away from the fact that...
New Posts  All Forums: