or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by anantksundaram

If you really believe this -- and are not just spouting off -- you can profit from it. You know, put your money where your mouth is. Buy long-term index puts. Don't you want to become more wealthy? Why don't/won't you do it? (Fixed a typo).
That has to be the dumbest statement I've heard in a while.
In an interview on CNBC this morning, the CEO of BHP-billiton, the largest mining company in the world and huge supplier to China, brought up Cook's reassuring words about sales continuing to be strong there as being an important factor affecting his thinking.To suggest that the words of the CEO of the largest company on the world (by market cap) with a quarter of its (and growing portion of its) sales in China -- especially when there's near-unanimous agreement that China...
I did NOT call the poster 'daft.' Read much?'Fanboi'? Wow. Welcome to 2007.
Netflix is a ludicrous comparison to Apple. It's a stock with some weird PE ratio in the region of 200x to 300x, i.e., you would therefore expect that stock to be all over the map.Not remotely in the volatility league of an incredibly mature, stable company like Apple with a PE ratio not even in the low teens (even including the cash).
That's a rather daft statement.It was down 13% before that, at its worst point. An 11 percentage points reversal.
For the past couple of years, Kramer has been incredibly -- and consistently -- supportive of Apple as a stock to buy and hold, rather than to jump in and out of.Also, he loves his AppleWatch, parading it around and flashing it in his morning show almost every single day.Perhaps those things matter to Cook.
Yeah, we can't. After all, he's known for his lying.ᵢ
W(ho)TF is Eric Jackson?
The vesting is based on relative performance, not absolute performance. Also, it is based on two- (and soon, three-) year performance periods. In other words, for August 24, 2015, it would be based on the TSR (total shareholder returns: capital gains + dividends) from August 23, 2013. The stock has done very well. The stock was selling for $71 then. In other words, it would have vested anyway.
New Posts  All Forums: