or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by mr O

There actually is. 3.5" and 4" are the perfect size if you're looking for an on-the-go iDevice. I love my 3.5" iPhone. 5" and 5.5" are already changing the Nature of the product. It could work as an iPod Touch as you don't use it as a phone (read: you don't hold it next to your head like a phone).
I like his Leadership. Very very focused. & Calm   The only thing I would improve is the product roll out. All the product updates seem to happen in the Fall season? Why not having new iPods and Macs in Springtime?
You're right. My interaction with the iPhone is very limited. It is mainly making calls and short on the go interactions with some very good apps (I am loving Clear, Rise, Solar, Mailbox, Instagram and Adobe Kuler for instance). When I am out in the world I do not want to be immersed in my iOS.I am using the iPad for media content, surfing the web being one of them. The iPad is something to get cosy with. Usually in the evenings and on Sunday.
hey folks, I am enjoying the discussion here.It looks like the data plan is more of an issue to you than the actual screen? You want to merge two devices in one?What's threatening is the fragmentation of the screen sizes. It is going to complicate the design for iOS apps. I'd be very surprised if Apple ditched the 3.5" screen as it is still being produced in the shape of the iPhone 4S.
gwmac,You need to identify what you really want:You want to phone and do basic tasks on the go: get the iPhone.You want to surf the web comfortably: get the iPad. The 7.9" iPad mini is already on the edge for surfing the web. A 5.5" iPod (or iPhone if you like) will still be a bad device for surfing the web. It will only improve the keyboard experience.You're mixing up two different devices with different purposes here. "On the Go" versus "In the Couch". Only Apple seems...
Okay. So you want a device with an iPhone flow: Checking and tapping on the go.It sounds like you could be served with a 5.5" iPod touch? It is the only iPhone like device that you don't need to hold to your head. It would make the iPod sexy again …
-sigh- here we go again.   What's an iPhone for? Yes, it is primarily to make a phone call and to be connected at all times because you want to stay up to date with your social life! Apps are basic and focused on simple straightforward tasks: Checking and tapping.   iPad apps already look and feel different than iPhone/iPod apps. They are focused on basic tasks as well, but in a more laid back manner. So, here's my remark: Why the need for creating something in...
Actually, Apple could incorporate a virtual click wheel inside iOS. It could be a little icon inside iTunes next to the play bar. Selecting this will generate a virtual click wheel overlay which let's you skip (or skim?) inside a song.   I do miss the fine tuning capabilities of the click wheel in iOS.
iPod Shuffle = The Shuffle has a low price barrier. It is a great intro to Apple's iTunes eco system. I believe they will keep it. ? - iPod nano = Will Apple drop the nano in favor of the new iWatch? ? - iPod classic = The click wheel remains the best interface when skipping inside a song. Will Apple keep a dedicated music player? They could combine the click wheel with a touchscreen? I hope they do. The iconic click wheel still makes sense on an UX level. iPod mini =...
I got introduced to iOS through my iPod touch. What I miss is the scroll wheel. It remains by far the best way to skip inside a song, especially if you're listening to a long DJ set.
New Posts  All Forums: