Perhaps this'll prompt Apple to let us get a preview of their plans both for streaming and the next Apple TV. That they may do if Amazon's offering is innovative and appealing enough. If it's not, they're likely to stay mum.
Hopefully, Apple won't abandon the current screen size. Some people, particularly petite women, like their phones small and easy to hold. Keeping the current size and adding a significantly larger one makes more sense.
I'd suggest keeping most of the other specs the same but giving the larger one a longer battery life, something iPhones have long needed.
Quote: Office for iPad will use what Microsoft referred to as a "freemium model," allowing users to install the app view documents, but requiring a subscription to Office 365 to make edits.
If automakers had a similar model, we could park 'our' car in front of our homes, go out kick tires and and look at it anytime we want. The only thing we couldn't do would be to get in and drive it away. That's not a "freeminum model." That's simply a hideously crippled app.
I hope Apple doesn't make their new model line too complicated. I'm still using an ancient white MacBook for on the go because none of their current models quite fit what I want.
* 11" MBA. I like the size, but the screen is too pixelated.
* 13" MBA. The screen is OK, but the RAM is soldered in and the cost of more RAM is grossly inflated.
* 13" MBP. OK and I like being able to add my own RAM, but the MBP with R is only $100 more.
* 13" MBP with R. Fine features, but...
Network neutrality might be the pretense, but the real reason Apple may face troubles is likely to lie elsewhere. There seems to be a cozy and well-established 'relationship' between the DOJ and Amazon, aka crony capitalism Chicago-style.
A few years back, Amazon owned 90% of the ebook market and was selling ebooks below cost to destroy what feeble competition remained. Apple, with some assistance from major books publishers, was entering the market and about to give...
For those of us with iPhones, the real issue isn't whether the battery assembly is automated. It's just how hard the manual battery replacement will be. Are this busy little robots smearing lots of ticky-tacky on these batteries as they install them or are the batteries snapped in and easily replaced?
As Apple adds more services that earn subscription money from those who use its products (i.e. streaming music and TV), it becomes more and more important for Apple to keep...
No, all I'm saying is that people must only patent a particular and workable solution to a problem. That's what patents were in the past.
Today's patent schema lets them patent an problem by simply waving their arms about and saying that, "Something I plan to do in the future will solve this problem." It also unfairly favors those who file first, even if, when they file, they haven't got a clue as to what the solution is.
The present scheme favors large...
How typical of today's patent applications. There's much mention of self-evident, beneficial results that should never be patentable coupled with mere arm-waving about how it would be done. Saying it'll be done with software says nothing.
We need to go back to how patents used to be issued. You had to bring in a working model and what you patented only covered how that particular device worked. You could not patent merely the idea of lighting a room with electricity. You...