Posts by photoeditor

Quote: Originally Posted by JeffDM On the point updates, I don't remember any UI changes, ever. Maybe there was one or two when the UI had a bug in it somewhere, then fixing it might be a UI change. How about restoring to the user...

It seems modestly better than 10.5.3 but it still is not up to Tiger standards. This is the first Mac OS since 9.2.2 (I skipped 10.0 and 10.1) that I've had stability issues with. It fell apart for me a couple of hours ago after...

That's ambitious. I suppose, then, that OS X and the Adobe CS3 installer are no longer in mortal combat . . . InDesign no longer must jump over the tops of the trenches through a hail of machine gun fire simply to run . . . Leopard no...

MIT has produced a PDF plugin for Firefox 3, which it put up on the web the night it launched by the looks of it. Firefox-Mac-PDF has just about everything its Safari equivalent has, with the exception of the handy little Leopard...

A weird graphics bug new to 10.5.3 I haven't seen mentioned anywhere else but I have been able to replicate with two system installs. The Dock in 10.5.2 is syrupy-smooth -- just as it is in all the Steve-notes. In 10.5.3, it is an...

More and broader iSync support (why is my Moto Z6c not officially supported yet, and why limit file synchronization to iCal and Mail?). More storage space (GMail + 3GB does not equal "enough for photos and multimedia"). More...

Quote: Originally Posted by Carniphage It's clear that Apple will try to make a better iPhone, by improving on iPhone 1.0 They need to 1) Improve reception - by adopting a more radio-transparent case 2) Add 3G - which comes at the...

Someone tell the design Nazis at Apple that it's already thin enough. If you get it any thinner, it will become uncomfortable to hold like the RAZR flip phones. Their real object should be to improve battery life and functionality...

. . . and maybe the code-name amounts to a tacit admission of that? In any case, if it is a freebie, if it improves quality, and if they continue refining and supporting 10.5 for legacy systems for a decent period of time, I'm all in...

Maybe they could do something about Adobe's installer too? That thing takes FOREVER, hammers the processor, and half the time you think it's hung. What's it doing -- translating between different versions of OS X on the fly?