or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Frank777

 I think the claim is that it will have a USB 3.1 port.
Before we start echoing the Final Cut X debate exactly, could the impatient Aperture users please take a deep breath and remember that in major software transitions Apple typically tries to get the basics right and then add complex features in the next few releases?   Aperture will continue to work in the meantime.
Uh oh. Sounds like making USB 3.1 gear is hitting some roadblocks.   Wonder if this means anything for the release date for the 12"?
Okay, I was being a bit mischievous with the post. I do know the Mac Mini's in a different weight class.   But the HP unit does exude a certain energy that the original Mac Mini had.   It's basically saying "find a use for me" which is how Mac guys originally viewed the Mini. Then people ran out and built Media units, Home and Office servers, Car Audio installs and the like.   It's been awhile since that kind of thing surrounded the Mini. I think a lot of people...
While I'm sure the new $500. Mini completely beats this in performance, it is a bit disconcerting that HP's new Mini PC is so much smaller, cheaper and lighter than Apple's.   After all, if you're going to lock down upgrades and remove the server features, you might as well go small or go home, right?
 Yep. I bought a Yikes G4 back in the day and saw it upgraded to the Sawtooth motherboard before I barely had a chance to break it in. Early adoption has a downside, and given that this issue only affects a very small minority of users, it doesn't really worry me. The 2015 version should be amazing, with Thunderbolt 3 and USB 3.1 ports, Skylake processors (and new RAM right?)Also, the 5K Thunderbolt display should be about ready for mass production by mid-year. I think...
 AFAIK, TextEdit still has a floating color palette.
Affinity Designer offers a CMYK workflow, and Photoshop and InDesign alternatives are said to be on the way from them.   2015 is going to be a great year for Mac artists and designers.
Actually, if you truly promised to do THAT to Ottawa, many Canadians would fight to elect you Prime Minister.
 It absolutely was Canadians, fighting as part (and with the combined forces of) the British Empire. And given the current state of North American education, I have no doubt that people living directly below Canada would advocate using military weapons with contaminants that would feed directly into your own water supplies.
New Posts  All Forums: