or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by hillstones

People are entitled to their OPINION, whether you like it or not.  They don't get banned.  Read anything other than an Apple-Fanboy site and you will read unbiased facts about the Apple Watch.  It will be expensive, it duplicates the functions of the iPhone, it requires an iPhone, it will only work with an iPhone, do people need a duplicate tech device, will Apple be able to convince someone to spend $350 for a device that does nothing more than an iPhone?  Will people buy...
That is exactly it.  The SmartWatch category is not very big.  Not many people wear a watch, and if they do, it is to tell time only.  They already have a smartphone for everything else.  They are not likely to drop $350+ for a duplicate device.  People don't want to carry around duplicate devices.  Even Apple makes duds from time to time: iPod Hi-Fi, Power Mac G4 Cube, Flower Power iMac, Dalmatian iMac, the PowerBook G3 (without L2 cache), the iPod shuffle without...
Apple can't get their watch to last more than a day, and the Swatch Group watch does not require charging.  That would be a win for consumers.  Also, the watch shown above is far better looking than the ugly Apple Watch.  The Apple Watch is high on the ugly scale next to the Flower Power and Dalmatian iMacs.  Apple doesn't seem to have the chops lately either with software.  They still can't fix the Bluetooth and Wi-Fi issues with Yosemite and iOS 8.  So if you think the...
Then you would have a pretty boring movie.  Dramatic effect always has to be added to make the movie enjoyable to watch.  How was the prior movie not accurate?  Care to give some details on what you think was not accurate?
You do realize that is not a final set photo, don't you?  Plastic did exist in the 90s and in the 70s.  It is not a real set photo because rolling luggage did not exist in the 70s.
True, but that typically applies to some SSD drives that were released in 2014 and later, not earlier model SSD drives.  So one would have to do research on the drive they purchased to see if it has the components capable of handling their own garbage collection techniques.
TRIM should be enabled when using SSD drives.  The quick reason "Trimming enables the SSD to handle garbage collection overhead, which would otherwise significantly slow down future write operations to the involved blocks, in advance."
That is one way of saying it, by naming Apple and not OS X.  OS X fully supports TRIM and SSD drives, but Apple intentionally disables TRIM support for third-party SSD drives.  Which is why Trim Enabler is needed when you have a third-party SSD installed.  Would be nice if Apple just relented and allowed TRIM support for any SSD drive, since Macs prior to 2012 could easy be upgraded with a third-party drive, much larger than Apple's tiny offerings in those models.  Back in...
Correct, and this only became an issue with Yosemite because of kext signing.  Prior versions of OS X did not require the Trim Enabler program to be disabled before an update was run, and then re-enabled after the update was installed.
Transfer all those baby videos off the iPhone, run the update, and then sync them back to the iPhone as movies, if she really wants them on the phone.
New Posts  All Forums: