or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Powerdoc

I would not say that the market is rejecting republicanism, I said that the market was foolish and pay the bill now. According to Gordon Brown, this crisis was announced ten years ago. The lack of regulation of the financial market is the main reason. A new kind of regulation has to be found, and I truly expect, that only economic perspective will prevail, and not the eternal right/left debate.
There is no link between punishment and Barak Obama The truth is that the punishment is just the logical consequence of bad regulation and bad behaviors coming from the financial market. Unfortunately for Mac Cain, his ground of predilection is not the economy, but foreign policy. So the truth is that if Obama will win, it will certainly related to the financial bankrupcy.
Note that the failure of Wall Street, will lead probabily to the election of OBama. Without the credit crunch, Mac Cain was the favorite.
Nice to see you here Hassan
Not forgetten at all. Lessons should be take, but we are facing an emergency.
Moral or not, the problem is that if nothing is done, the whole economy will collapse. This an emergency, the lessons of this failure should be taken later.
I did watch the debate on french TV while I have some troubles as always to sleep in a hotel. I find it boring. I was expecting blood and gut, and nothing happens I will rate both candidate the same, but Obama has an advantage. People will give him more credit as a president than before. Mc Cain already had this credit.
Mac Cain want to postpone the debate, because economy is not his best field of play (remember that he declared some weeks ago, that the root of US economy are solid). He wanted to discuss about foreign politic, something where Obama is not very confortable. If the campaign is still focusing on economy, Mc Cain have no chance to be elected. The crisis is a very bad new for him, that's why he want to delay.
Good question, because we can see two answers to this statement : - when you don't have to rent a house (because you own it) you save money or - people owning house are in a statitical point of vue more rich, than people renting. Perhaps it's a mix of both
You right Fellows, the baby himself is of course not a failure. By failure, I meaned the way I educated my child. Once the mistake is done, we have to deal it, the best way we can, and that's another story and I respect nearly all the choices. I just wanted to say IMHO that 17 is not the right age to raise a baby. At 17 99,99 % of the time you are not mature enough to raise a child.PS : the audio message is interesting, but it deal more with rebellion than anything else. I...
New Posts  All Forums: