Quote:
Originally Posted by REM#1
I doubt that the MacBook will be upgraded before MacWorld January 2008. I base this on the fact that the MacBook was just upgraded and so was the MacBook Pro.
The next upgrade I expect, in January,...
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenaustus
I used IBM's 3 pound ThinkPad X Series before I switched and thought it was a great form factor - even if there was no optical drive included.
I wish my 12" PowerBook didn't have an optical...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ianjoh
Well, 2560x1600 on a 24" display is only 125 ppi - not much better resolution than what we have now! Certainly not enough for me to fork over big bucks for a new display and not high enough to...
The Santa Rosa chipset supports up to 4GB of memory so, until Intel offer a laptop chipset which supports 8 or 16GB, Apple cannot. My guess is this might happen in 2009.
I want 2560x1600 in a monitor not larger than 24 inches. Anything about 18 to 24 inches would be fine. I have a 1600x1200 20 inch monitor now and I want substantially better resolution without substantially larger size.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvin
I don't think there will be that many at all because they'll need access to Leopard's developer tools and Leopard itself to be able to render interface elements in PDF format. NeoOffice doesn't even...
The Leopard features I care most about are Resolution Independence (because it will lead to sharper, easier to read screens) and Time Machine. I would spend the $129 for either of those, but I haven't seen any other features for which I...
Quote:
Originally Posted by hobBIT
There were rumors about a 13" LED backlit panel Apple is sourcing. If the screen could be made really slim, like 2mm instead of the ca. 7mm now and the DVD drive upgraded to a slim drive (the 7mm...
