or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Alfiejr

no no no When Apple announced the iWatch, it presented an actual finished physical product with pre-production hardware samples on hand and at the announcement. its beta software was not ready for hands-on demo then, but the fact is that it will be going on sale now about six months later. and the same was true of the original iPhone announcement btw. that is not "vaporware" in any sense of that term and it is totally ridiculous to say it is. MS' so-called HoloLens is at...
the Adobe security notice lists IE and Firefox specifically as vulnerable. but does not list Safari. so is Safari vulnerable too or not?
no it's someone with a really great sense of humor. which no pundit i know of has.
The Macalope broke this story last week already.
geeze, what a grump! did someone put a gun to your head and make you read it? how about let him have his Editorial fun - some other folks enjoy it too - while you just go someplace else ...
Bottom Line for all this back and forth:   - pulling your phone out of your pocket to pay is undeniably physically simpler than any credit card system can ever be. because that card is always inside something - wallet, purse, etc. - and getting it out and using it takes two hands and two steps, and the same again to put it back. (plus i button my wallet pocket, so three steps each way for me).   - fingerprint identity confirmation - the Apple implementation - is simply...
it's so obvious that Cook's "you're the proudct" comment hit home - and hard.   Zuckerberg, the arrongant fool. what a "tell." he should never play poker.
it's really a head scratcher why any top execs at MS really think this ad campaign can/will work. the simplest explanation is they just don't have any idea what else to do, and this is all they have left. they already tried - for years - to sell "it's Windows on a touchscreen tablet!" - and that just never worked. Hint: very few actually want Windows on a touchscreen, but very many don't.   i assume this ad campaign has been funded for a certain time frame - to the end...
 just wrong. see above. ah come on. it is clear from what Rubin actually did in the years he was in charge of Android that he envisioned the Nexus line as much more than a prototype. and then he bought Motorola! and no, it wasn't just for the patents. it was to potentially become an OEM too. and it's clear his schemes truely "flopped" and Paige dumped him because of that. that was the history that DED referenced in his off-hand "flop" remark that you took issue with - he...
ah, good of you to cherry-pick some Google PR quotes from 2014 about its Nexus line intentions - it's a testing platform, a prototype. at least, nowadays it is. but let's go back a few years to the beginning, shall we? and see if that was the only original goal. after rummaging around a lot of Wikipedia Nexus products footnotes, i found this article from 2012 that sums it all up...
New Posts  All Forums: