Interesting that this is released the day of Apple's iPhone 5 release and probably isn't any different than all the other Chinese factories.
I'm sure this article will spread across the Internet fast, since it's Apple bashing fodder,...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfiejr
another example of idiotic tech "journalism." "taking aim" would mean producing a product aimed at the same market as the iPad - a large format premium device. which a 7" $200...
I'm disappointed we didn't hear anything about even some rudimentary improvements to enable some type of multi-user restrictions.
Something as simple as a passcode locked folder where I can put my apps that I don't need the...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Povilas
I disagree. Show me a better one.
Whether a better one exists or not doesn't mean it isn't a mess.
iTunes doesn't necessarily need to be broken into separate applications but that doesn't mean it...
Quote:
Originally Posted by thompr
I read those statements differently. The entire patent portfolio statement is with regards to Motorola getting the licenses to use. The mutual carve-outs are with respect to which of Apple's patents...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellacool
But how does the average consumer know it is beta? That is the rub on this. An does beta really excuse a company? If that was the case, companies would slap beta on everything.
Labelling as...
How about just returning the feature to login directly to the current user on the remote machine which they removed in Lion. (without needing remote confirmation)
With resolution increases and increased media enriched content from these new iBooks, I sure hope we see some larger storage options in the iPad 3.
iCloud has some nice features but storing 1GB+ iBooks and bigger apps is going to fill...
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRulez
As the article notes, the Qualcomm chips are not in question here. This suit deals with the Infineon chips, used in Apple's 3G products.
Which were also licensed.
The question is if a company is...