or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by palomine

The question I have for you all is what is wrong with a different 'style' CEO? Who the hell says a CEO can only be a brash assertive person? And NOW everyone admires SJ as a visionary? He was lambasted daily while he was alive as a cocky fool by the media. 'Reality distortion field' etc. Jobs was a visionary the whole time regardless of what was reported about him. Cook is different from Jobs, why can't he just do his thing without all this fuss? He's actually been...
You are correct Futureman. In addition to all that other stuff they are trying to juggle, Amazon was in a race with Spacex and another company whose name escapes me at the moment, to win a government contract. Spacex won, the other company won recognition but Bezos' model was rejected. I can see some major E G O at work here with mr.Bezos. What an airbag. This should be the classic American riches to rags story , the opposite of what I said in 1997 about Steve Jobs. I...
Ooh, a tablet with little bitty crunchy keys on it? Portrait or landscape? That's where they are going, back to the button keyboard, lol
I just changed my default search to Bing. Not out of any caring for MS, except to say Thanks for creating the 'Scroogled' meme. Really glad the meme has started now. Perhaps it will get people to wondering about things. Maybe the idea will gain repetition and traction. Hope MS does more commercials like this.
When it comes to the big three financial rags, Fortune, Forbes and Barron's, ther has scarcely been a single mildly positive article regarding Apple in the last year. Oh, throw in the New York Times. I realize they all get click bait revenue, but that doesn't explain everything because any article with Apple in it will get clicked on. No, it's almost as if somebody is paying them to run these negative articles. They make Apple sound like a Disaster, when, if they did...
Wasn't there an article here recently that Intel was planning on making a tablet of its own? Not sure I trust them.
I still say that sooner or later fundamentals will take over the driver's seat for stock prices.
I hope they split the stock, just for psychological reasons. People compare Apple's price to Google's, not considering that Apple has already split ~4 times, last time in 2005. Google hasn't split at all.   Jim Cramer should be under investigation. Sheesh they all have the same defense, 'everybody else says these same things I heard it from them'.  Do they all drink at the same bar? Cramer, though, has an obvious mental illness. If you watch the video those quotes are...
There might be a good demand for wearables, even in a watch form, (obviously not for wear by workers in fields that require heavy duty hand use, unless also available in other form factors) I am a lifelong wristwatch hater, they drive me crazy, lame stupid timepieces. I've been offered fine watches and don't want them. I know many people who love their watches. Etc. blah blah blah. However, for some reason I got mad that the original watch size Nano was redesigned...
Along with this theory I would add the bit about Goldman Sux selling those instruments levered to the stock price, that individuals lost so much money on. Hmmm.. I seem to remember Cramer months back saying how he didn't like the company he was keeping while invested in AAPL, too much like investing with the Penny Stock guys....could he have been referring to the Goldman Sachs sucker play? Then a few weeks after that Cramer said something about 'the stock [AAPL] needs ...
New Posts  All Forums: