or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by SDW2001

 I thought we were supposed to avoid the violent rhetoric?  IOKIYAD.  
What a tool our President is.
I had a problem with both iMessage and SMS. I reset the network settings, turned iMessage off and on, and then made sure the "send as SMS when iMessage is not available" option was turned on. No problems now.
 Apparently.  The cognitive dissonance is amazing.  He talks of red lines and then, in the same breath, says he wasn't elected to start wars. He's a bumbling fool.  
 What are they?    To be fair, no one is talking about doing that.    I tend to agree, though  I don't think he views it like that.  I think it's all about ego.  It's all about him saving face.    I agree about the power vacuum.  In strictly strategic terms, I'm not sure I agree with the possible consequences you lay out.  It won't help our relations with the Muslim world, nor with Iran in particular.  But I actually think the chances of it blowing up into a regional war...
  Yeah, I saw that.  Hillary and Obama were calling Assad a "reformer" a few years ago, too.  My take on what happened is this:  We were fine with Assad (and he with us) until this civil war got going.  He used brutal force.  His forces committed war crimes by targeting civilians.  We started supporting the rebels covertly, with some openly calling for them to be armed directly by the United States.  The rebels became more effective and organized, and Assad started to...
  I see you've vomited into the thread again.         Conservatives aren't really protesters in general, with the exception of the Tea Party wing.  As for chemical weapons, there are a lot of possibilities as to what happened.  I tend to believe that Assad did use chemical weapons, and that the admin knows this.  Of course, it could all be bullshit...but I'm placing that aside for a moment.     My real problem is how the entire situation has been handled by the bumbling...
Hmmm...seems quiet in this thread, despite the fact that we are about to attack Syria without UN or Congressional approval. Funny, I don't hear any liberals screaming about preemptive war, or LYING about WMD. I also don't see anyone noticing that my prediction contained within the title of this thread is now coming to fruition. Obama will be the cause of this. Had he simply made a convincing threat to attack if chemical weapons were used (or set a policy of staying out...
Been pretty AWOL this summer from AI....I see sammi is still at it.  
Zimmerman will likely face a similar suit. The problem is the evidence is really weak despite the reduced burden of proof (preponderance of evidence vs. reasonable doubt). He also is going to sue the living shit out of NBC, and probably get a large settlement.
New Posts  All Forums: