or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by SDW2001

 I started that thread on 9/4/2012.  Show me one thing from that OP that was wrong at the time.  By the way...that phrase you're using?  I don't think you know what it means.  
 Totally unrealistic and counter to the principles of the free market.  Capital flows along the path of least resistance.  If you want Apple to bring more money back into the U.S., you have to remove some of the obstacles.  Secondly, they get beneficial tax treatment because that's the law. The complexity of international tax law is way beyond what any of us laymen understand.  You can't just wave a wand and say "you have to pay U.S. tax rates now!"  
 Exactly.  Ireland has certain laws that are beneficial.  It's not at all surprising that corporations choose to do business there.  It would be no different than if Pennsylvania said it was eliminating all corporate taxes for 10 years.  Businesses would flock to the state.  
 I'm just going by the polling data.  I'm not sure why reading a large portion of data and summarizing various sources' conclusions would be amusing.    I don't know to what you are referring.    Wow.  10 years later, and you're still bringing up WMDs in Iraq.  That's impressive.  As for "incredibly wrong about everything," that's a wildly exaggerated and inaccurate claim.     Impeachment has nothing to do with punishing a President.  ;)   Well, apparently you don't read...
 LOLOLOL.   Your party's President lives in the smallest bubble since Nixon's last days, and we're out of touch?  The Democrats are going to take a historic shellacking in 2014, and we're out of touch.  The President is pushing job-destroying climate change actions, closing coal plants and making electricity skyrocket all while gas is still almost $4 a gallon....and we're out of touch? 
 Wishful thinking?  I just stated that while I consider impeachment absolutely necessary after this President's wanton lawlessness, it's unlikely to happen.  I am noting, however, that the word is starting to be used in public.  I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that you disagree, even though his law breaking is absolutely indisputable.   As for 2016, who knows.  I don't think Hillary is as invincible as you might believe.  It really depends on who the GOP runs.  I know...
 It is untrue to state that the GOP's overreach on impeachment had long-term consequences.  They retained control of the House for another 9 years.  The Senate was basically GOP run for most of that time as well.  They won the Presidential election in 2000 and 2004, as well as a massive midterm victory in 2002.  Get real.  
 1.  As Hands explained, he was referencing the Islamification of Europe only.  He is absolutely correct.  2.  You should really get to know the person to whom you are speaking.  Calling Hands "rightwing" is laughable.  You'd know that if you spent more than 5 minutes here spouting off on things that you know nothing about.   3.  The murder rate?  Yeah, that's a simple fix.  I mean, we should just ban handguns, right?  Or pass restrictive gun laws?  It's not like it's a...
 Graham:  Impeachment if He Does it Again That was quick.  That is the first time I have heard a serious use of the word in public.  I still think you're right...it's unlikely to happen.  Then again, even several top Dems and supporters have condemned his actions.  Feinstein, Panetta, Prof. Turley, etc.   Despite my absolute opposition to his agenda and the fact I think he is the single worst President ever to hold office, I did not want to see the nation go through this....
Despite Obama's lawlessness, I would have never predicted this was even possible, politically speaking.  But, with the recent prisoner exchange issue, I'm starting to believe there may be enough bipartisan outrage that it may happen.     Top Ranking Dem calls exchange "dangerous precedent"     The President that Richard Nixon Always Wanted to Be   Senate Democrats Flip    Time:  Whitehouse Overrode Internal Objections     As far a I am concerned, there is more...
New Posts  All Forums: