or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by SDW2001

  I'll what you what does:  The fact that the OP started a thread blaming Mitt Romney for something that happened under Obama's watch as a direct result of the latter's incompetence. 
1.  Romney made his statements before he knew about the deaths.   2.  Romney is correct.  What we are seeing now is a direct result of the President's completely ineffective, incompetent and dangerous policy in the Middle East. He pushed out the friendly, stable, pseudo-dictator in favor of the Muslim Brotherhood and radical Islamists.  Mubarak may have sucked, but he was known, kept stability and relatively friendly towards our interests.   Additionally, he led from...
  Again, the many of the polls are bogus because of the oversampling of Dems and undersampling of independents and Republicans.  The turnout models are also wrong.  The former is deliberate.  
  This, on a day where the American flag was torn down at our embassy in Egypt?  Yeah, Obama really has a handle on foreign policy.  
By the way, the latest CNN poll severely oversampled Dems and undersampled GOP/independents.  Romney is actually winning by 8 points.   Just another example of egregious media bias.  Add that to reputable polls overestimating minority turnout (and underestimating senior turnout) and it's clear that Obama is in huge trouble.     http://www.examiner.com/article/mitt-romney-would-lead-eight-unskewed-data-from-newest-cnn-orc-poll       Edit:  Oh look, another...
  Your economy is not growing for exactly the opposite of the reasons you suggest.  The reason is that despite any cuts you've made, you still have a tax and regulatory environment that punishes success and rewards failure.  You have social programs that make the U.S. look positively Randian.   You spend too much and tax too much.  It's not hard to understand.     As for recovering with slow growth:  The statement that you don't go from deep recession to solid recovery is...
  I wasn't being personal.  I was simply saying it was evident that you don't understand what "anecdotal" means.      1.  A small collection?  It goes back 1980.   The poll is 8-0, and you're telling me it doesn't mean anything?     2.  "My" evidence is multi-faceted.  You linked to a single poll, one that has been 5-7 points lower for months.   Apparently your statistical prowess doesn't consider data point outliers.     3.  You'd be hard pressed to find something more...
Let's discuss the new Obama poll that has Hands and company frothing at the mouth.  Dick Morris recently explained why many of the polls are wrong.  First, the 50% approval rating is very likely temporary.  His approval rating has been in the forties for months now.  Nothing has changed other than the post-convention bump.  It's not as if there is any hard data or events that have caused the sudden increase.  Gallup also oversampled Democrats (there's a surprise)....
    Indeed.  And even if we credit Obama for "turning around" job growth, the results are poor.  Current job growth does not even keep up with population growth.  Reducing unemployment without counting those who drop out of the workforce requires about 150,000 jobs per month...consistently (cough).   Real unemployment is actually stagnant, if not getting worse. 
 
New Posts  All Forums: