Posts by randian

Quote: Originally Posted by FuturePastNow I don't know what chipset the first mobile Nehalem processors will use, but it probably won't be Montevina, which doesn't appear to support Quickpath and obviously would have an extraneous...

Quote: Originally Posted by MacBookAir77 No one likes the Mini and one is really buying the Mini I like the Mini! I don't even mind that it has integrated graphics. What I don't like is that it's so far behind the curve in terms of...

Quote: Originally Posted by BenRoethig 4. Lack (and position) of ports. As great as it is, use of firewire (especially 800) is rare. Most devices are going to be USB. That I don't get. Most DSLRs are USB, it seems. If you're...

It retails for £780. See a review here.

Do I prefer SPARC to the botch that is x86? Sure. I'm also a big-time MIPS supporter (SGI > Sun). Unfortunately going x86 was a far better business decision even though it's a vastly inferior technical decision. Apple has little...

Quote: Originally Posted by troberts You will most likely be waiting until May, 2009, if you want your MacBook to have a Nehalem processor in it if the MacBook keeps its 6-month refresh cycle. Here is how I see it: Current - Merom...

If Apple would get off its duff and design a Mini with the same dual-core CPUs as the MB Pro, optional quad-core CPU (when available), X4500HD GPU, slots for 4GB RAM, and Apple-TV sized so you can have an internal power supply and...