Posts by lamewing

Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil  AND RIGHTLY SO! Screw that. They don't have to apologize for ANYTHING. He knows how good it WILL be; why would he apologize for that? That's like Einstein's parents...

At their ages, boy could simply retire and live comfortably on their multi-millions, travel, do volunteer work, help others in so many ways...but I am sure both will only want to make ore money.

Easy to say when your company only holds a small portion of the personal computer market. If it were reversed and Apple owned 90%ish of the market they wouldn't be able to easily drop legacy hardware support. 

Quote: Originally Posted by Neo42    ... but they declare Samsung DID infringe.  Twice even. Providing more libel...something they should be punished for. If Samsung can be held up by their short...

Quote: Originally Posted by Tulkas  In your taxes comparison, it would actually be more like someone getting away with paying exactly what they are legally required to pay.    I really don't see...

Quote: Originally Posted by Neo42    Basically it says Samsung was found not guilty by this court, but guilty by these other courts.  By tacking on the commentary they are undermining the intent of the...

Quote: Originally Posted by cpenzone  The ONLY reason this products is $329 and not $299 is because the iPod touch is $299.     Agreed. I took a trip to B&N and Staples and tested out the Nook...

I wonder what it would be like to go to a web site's forum and find posts (positive or negative) that are based on actual use of a product vs. blind fanboyism?    Right...like that will ever happen...

Quote: Originally Posted by dasanman69  What's with the epidemic of people writing loosing for losing on AI? General stupidity...

Quote: Originally Posted by Suddenly Newton    Belief in an organized religion is not a requirement to be a consumer. Problem solved. I assume you mean membership in an organized religion?