Originally Posted by Narcogen
Even if it was in their deal with the record companies, I'm pretty sure the carrier (AT&T) has it disallowed.
You might think promoting heavy data use at expensive data rates would be in...
Originally Posted by AppleInsider
The Macs are likewise said to be fundamentally less expensive for the same level of performance than similar systems from Apple's competitors.
"The Mac Pros are highly competitive even...
Originally Posted by solipsism
Either way, we can debate which had more effect than the other and there is no way the debate will ever be definitively answered as there are just too many variables involved.
I don't understand the iPhone nano thing's logistics. It would have to be a completely crippled version for that to make any sense.
iPhone is a defined platform. The size of the screen is crucial to the way it feels and operates. iPhone...
Originally Posted by minderbinder
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.
Consensus was 1.08, which they beat.
The stock got hammered because consensus for *next* quarter was 1.25 and apple gave guidance of...
This is what really concerned me and no one has given me information to indicate this isn't what happened:
The lead story and EPS avg that every subsequent story cited was Bloomberg's internal consensus of 1.24. If any of you had been...
You guys are losing talking about SJ health.
The lead story and EPS avg that every subsequent story cited was Bloomberg's internal consensus of 1.24. If any of you had been reading AppleInsider today, the most generous EPS estimate...
Originally Posted by mdriftmeyer
Think about security, applescript, regular expressions, stored shadow passwords, sudo and bots.
That doesn't answer anything. None of those things - if touched in any given installer - are...