or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by PB

Good for you, and for me since I did so years ago. "Safe files" looked always funny to me, to put it mildly, and I have never left a Mac I had access to, or any account on it, with this on. But does the security update turns this option off? Or it sitll leaves it on?
It is precisely an example of well-designed and executed social engineering. Nothing new in OS X or any operating system in this world. That's all.
Yes, there is; it is the Latin plural. Generally it is not accepted in English but this is sometimes a subject of debate.
Yes and it happened years ago as a proof of concept with an mp3 file. This was one of the reasons that pushed Apple to update Mac OS X so that it warns the user when something (s)he tries to open, usually downloaded from internet, contains executable and potentially malicious code. I don't know if it is easy or not to bypass this kind of protection. However, the open "safe files" option is still there in Safari activated by default. This is beyond logic today.
Apparently Apple thinks that people are so stupid, or that Mac OS X is so badly designed that, after initiating a download, which makes the download window to pop-up letting you see what are your options, no one or very few will think to click "reveal in Finder" on that window. Apple really is shooting its own foot with this one; there is no such thing as "safe file" before you open it and inspect it. It is absolutely ridiculous to categorize files downloaded from...
It is clearly not a virus. It is rogueware based purely on social engineering.
I am afraid you are not alone in this. But all you can do at this point is to wait for the next update.
2011 iMacs: No SATA 6Gb/s, Yes to Multiple Drives.There is apparently a bug with it and this may explain why Apple left it out.
Certainly more expensive than in the US with some glaring exceptions like French cheese and wine, and fine quality Belgian chocolate and beer. But as I said, in the past Apple often tried to align the prices after updates according to currency balance. Of course, even then, the computers were still more expensive before considering tax but not as much as this time. Probably they are right, in the bigger scheme of things, to do so from their own perspective as a company in...
Not to me and to many people in Europe. Apple this time did not adjust prices to the new currency balance like they did many times in the past. Example: high end iMac, 27". It costs 2000 USD. In Belgium, without VAT it is 1570 euros. This makes today 2335 USD. Yep, $335 more to start with. Including tax the equivalent is 2825 USD. Tax is not Apple's fault but this time Apple has a share to this because the computer is overpriced from the beginning with respect to the USA...
New Posts  All Forums: