or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by bigmike

Agreed on the lower price. I think it should be no more than $249. If Apple wants to crush the competition, then it should be $199.
Samsung, You keep trying. You can't say you're awesome while being lame. Yes the S3 screen is bigger. Lots of people don't want a screen/phone that big. Lots of people don't want quirky interfaces that try to copy Apple's. No one waits in line for the S3. There's plenty of reasons. Apple's design is cleaner than yours. Lots of people like good design. Of course Apple isn't perfect, but maybe if you tried to do your own thing rather than follow Apple, you wouldn't end...
"We are all here to earn money" It's called modern-day slavery.
....The students are "encouraged to go to factories to learn more about society"....   So, basically it's learning to be a slave. An iPhone 5 slave.       ....allows students to "experience working conditions and promote individual ability."....   If the students have half a brain, they will experience those working conditions for a day, calculate their pay a second time, then use their individual ability to wake up and get the hell out of dodge.  
...According to Adobe, it was "no easy task"...  Yeah but you did it. Now let's get Photoshop updated for MBP peeps who do heavy professional photo work.
Also, a fun fact with a bit of irony is that many Samsung employees have iPhones. As well as many people in Seoul, which Samsung is home to.
  SJ did say that. And it's a true statement. I think it goes well with the phrase, "you snooze, you lose" especially in the business patent world. Besides, before Apple did the "pinch and zoom" correctly, it was butt ugly from the other guys.   Anyway, Samsung just needs to learn how to be creative. 
Real or rendered, I love the murdered-out look.
  a great portfolio piece that could land them a great 3D gig.
 .whocaresitsbusinessletsgetonwithourlives
New Posts  All Forums: