Posts by Dickprinter

Why is it that only companies which do exceptionally well (like Apple) get put under a microscope? Is it out of envy or jealousy? I realize Apple produces a much higher volume than most others but why should that influence the amount of...

Quote: Originally Posted by solipsism That was my thought. I'm expecting a completely new AppleTV from HW, to OS, to services, and hopefully an SDK within a year. I agree, also. Apple is great at sleight of hand, they don't hint at...

Quote: Originally Posted by alandail total cost of ownership tells a different story Thank you. Why haven't I heard anyone mention that once done with your Mac and you're ready to upgrade, you can sell it for a nice chunk of...

Offer free e-subscriptions to those who subscribe to the print editions as a bridge to migrating them to the e-model and at the same time charge the e-only subscribers. Publishers can then gauge what the market can bear during the...

Quote: Originally Posted by AngusYoung The "winner" of this great gift from Apple is responsible for paying all Tax and fees etc for the prize. So even if you sold it on EBay for $10,000 you would be taking a loss becaus of...

Quote: Originally Posted by TEKSTUD When you have to go to those extremes after you've launched your next "revolutionary" device then you know Apple is in BIG trouble. Imagine what you'd being saying if Steve Ballmer was...

Quote: Originally Posted by stevegmu I believe it was $1800 new, which was less expensive than the competitors, and outperformed them, to boot. I can't imagine there will be any $300 netbooks running in 10 years. Actually, mint...

Quote: Originally Posted by TEKSTUD The sell well because they do what they're advertised to do at an inexpensive price and are convenient as they do it. By the way - How much did that iBook 466 SE sell for in the year 2000 and how...

Quote: Originally Posted by 2oh1 I was trying to read this article, but somebody's Verizon map kept getting in the way. Yeah but it was the AT&T map so.....you good!

This article is ambiguous, at best.