or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Dickprinter

What a beautiful and clever execution of a white question mark on a blue square field, which doesn't resemble Apple's "slide to unlock" method at all. That should easily side-step infringing upon Apple's patent
After having been burnt in the past in one way or another, I think Apple makes doubly sure they dot their I's and cross their T's.
It was your delivery. Now, if Bob Hope said it...
And in your passion you make it clear that you hate everything and everyone except yourself, Apple and most users of Apple products. It gets to be a little much, sometimes.
A typical response is---That's a good start....but since they have $100 billion in the bank, they have the means and need to strive to do better.
I believe, by law, the budget needs to be in hard copy form so it can be entered into the National Archives.
Funny you should say that, Apple is going for the throat.http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...ringement.htmlI realize this suit is about camera tech and image previews but it does't change the fact that Apple is serious about protecting their IP and they obviously don't care about kicking Kodak while they're down.That's business! Edit: I wonder what the printer patent is about.
Huh? Make sense, please.
I wouldn't go there if I were you. You're barking up the wrong Apple tree.....by saying that here.
I'm glad to see the "good" and "evil" being recognized by the DoJ and that they'll "keep an eye" on the evil.
New Posts  All Forums: