or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by sflocal

I'm confused... isn't Nest's CEO Larry Page?  Why does this sell-out still think he's CEO??
Can we possibly get passed folks like you rewriting history.  Steve Jobs did not "rip off" Xerox in any which way, shape or form.  He got a license, free-and-clear, from Xerox to do whatever they want, and Xerox got a bunch of Apple stock from it.  Stop having a hissy-fit because the truth is not the way you want it to be.I'll give Blackberry, Microsoft, (former)Palm much more respect in helping push forward mobile tech along with Apple because at least they tried...
Nice try.I'm not some "blind loyalist".  I actually want great, bonafide competition from others that are trying to make a difference.  WebOS, Microsoft, Nokia, RIM... they all tried to make a difference to compete against Apple with REAL products, using their own stuff.  That's great and I loved it.Then there is the trash that Android is.  No, I am not criticizing people that can't afford a high-end smartphone.  What does irk me is that there are many people that do...
I understand the over-generalization of Android users.  I think most refer to the Android "enthusiasts".   It sounds like you and your wife use your Android phones for nothing more than a glorified feature phone and bare-bones pre-installed apps.Try using anything (if available) that uses the hardware in your cheap Huawei and you'll be in for a rude-awakening.  Walled-garden or not, it's why iPhone users are generally more happier using their devices - even with minimal...
Keep spinning it.What's shameful is people to mask crap as "competition".  We all want good, bonafide, competition.  It's great for everyone.  The mess that Android is, and the people that make excuses for such garbage, is pathetic to say the least.  Let's see Android and the manufacturers put out polished, worthy products that spurs real innovation and competition.  Right now, Android is battling for the cheapskates, the bottom-of-barrel customers, and purposeful...
I've said this time and time again for years.  Android devices are bottom-of-barrel products.  They compete for the lowest price point and people get what they pay for. The Android community (especially Fandroids) should be ashamed of themselves for their blind support of such trash and having low-to-zero standards and not expecting more from this botched experiment of a mobile OS.  It's a f*cking joke. They have liars like Samsung that spew nonsense statements about the...
I almost sprayed coffee in laughter after reading the headline...
Okay... fine.  Samsung lost on appeals, and it will also cover current and future devices - if any. So, will someone please explain if this means Apple can get damages for all those devices that were sold?  I want this to hurt Samsung in the pocketbook. At some point the courts will have to see that Samsung is using/abusing the courts and realize Samsung is taking advantage of the years it takes to come to a decision, which by then is largely obsolete and/or irrelevant.
The time has already come for Samsung.  Look at the failures of products they tried doing on their own without their R&D department in Cupertino.  Their gear watch, and the S5 both were major disappointments.  Their tablets are a joke, which is why they don't publish sales figures since the trials showed they lied through when it came to light their tablet sales were on the bottom of the list and the Kindle sold more than they did.Samsung is a company that needs to die....
Yep... when reliability and durability is an absolute must, there's only one tablet I'd want in that flight deck when heavy, paper manuals are no longer used. Trusting one's flight manuals to some trash Android tablet is like rolling dice. No thank you.
New Posts  All Forums: