or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by hill60

 That link has interesting wording:- no-googles-sundar-pichai-didnt-say-androids-openness-makes-it-less-insecure So he meant more insecure?
 If you want to provide a source for the flaw being used by anyone. ACTIVELY
 NFL must be gay, all the guys hanging all over each other, patting each others butts... ...I guess that's why they threatened to move the 2015 Superbowl. So what suits were filed in Arizona?
 Muslims and Jews here in Australia have no problem with owning restaurants which sell bacon and ham, Hindus own hamburger joints. The dollar is mightier than fairytale books on what to eat.
 What if that business owner made an arbitrary decision, called you gay because maybe he didn't like your clothes or your haircut and kicked you out of their store? What would you do then? Maybe he could hang a picture of a penis behind the counter and watch that your eyes don't linger too long as a test, before booting you out.
 Google love their customers, they make lots of money selling them information on their product users... ...oh, you confused Android users with Google's "customers", a common enough mistake.
 Why? It's good to have some balance after all the crap about Apple patching the "glaring" goto flaw, which was never actively exploited by anyone conducting man in the middle attacks.
Time for Rockstar to take their SEP's to the South Korean courts, now they have the green light to abuse them.
So how were they proposing to enforce this? A questionnaire filled out at the counter? A chart identifying what to look for? What happens if you're straight and wear stylish clothes? A couple of guys hanging out together? Taking your brother out to lunch. How do they judge, who gets to decide?
New Posts  All Forums: