Posts by Tulkas

So McAdams isn't exactly the brightest bulb in the bunch, hmm? Can think he honestly thinks he convinced Jobs to add LTE unless he is amongst the very dimmest of people walking the earth.

Quote: Originally Posted by SolipsismX  Remember the $2.99 charge to upgrade the WiFi firmware to support 802.11n. It may simply be a similar situation here where Apple doesn't want to deal having to charge some...

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=593719&fcc_id=BCG-E2599A C2PC Cover...

FCC filings make it clear there are NO hardware changes at all for AWS support. This is purely a firmware trigger. That being the case, why is Apple not going to simply expose the bands on existing phones through an OS update? Sort of...

There is no legitimate reason to allow locks in the first place and many reasons not to allow it at all.

Quote: Originally Posted by Gatorguy  Tulkas, if you check the timeline you'll find the order to publish by the original UK court came some days after the ruling of non-infringement, even tho the same judge made the...

Quote: Originally Posted by emcomments  Apple were initially only required to put a statement via a small link on their website (they claimed would take two weeks to organise) which they did in a few days. However the...

Quote: Originally Posted by Gatorguy  I didn't say the order came from an appeal. What I said was as long as Samsung doesn't continue to claim Apple is guilty, other than in an appeal, there wouldn't be any need for...

Quote: Originally Posted by MacGeek Pro  Samsung has been using the court cases with Apple as a marketing strategy to make Apple look like the bad guy and so far it seems to be working among the younger generation. The...

Quote: Originally Posted by Gatorguy  As long as Samsung doesn't continue to claim Apple guilty of the IP violation despite the ruling and outside of any appeal there shouldn't be a posting requirement. That's where...