Posts by Tulkas

Quote: Originally Posted by Crowley      Fantastic.  Two words, devoid of any context, in separate quotation marks are entirely valid examples as the unworthiness of the court.  Your...

Quote: Originally Posted by Crowley  "But what Apple wrote was true" isn't an attempt at a semantic argument?   You were very quick to throw around an accusation of double standards (dropped that one...

Quote: Originally Posted by whatever71  I think this shows who made the comment ref untrue info.  Admittedly this was off the dailymail so in no way can i guarantee this isn't made up!  Looks like it was the...

Quote: Originally Posted by Crowley    Until there's a name against it then it's unclear of the source of the "untrue" and "inaccurate" claim.  Samsung claimed that, but I've not seen anything that...

Quote: Originally Posted by whatever71  And what about the many worldwide cases that haven't gone in apple's favour?  Surely they too would add context to the uk decision rather than putting comments which imply...

Quote: Originally Posted by Crowley  That is an unsatisfactory reference; it's not clear who is saying that.  Hardly just cause for criticising the entire legal process and integrity of the...

Quote: Originally Posted by Crowley  For the third time, can you back up this claim that the court has said Apple have made a false statement?  I have only seen them describe it as...

Quote: Originally Posted by Gatorguy  Very last try: The German court cannot find infringement where a final EU-wide ruling finds there was none. So NO there is no finding of infringement by a German court....

Quote: Originally Posted by whatever71  man, you don't stop do you?  You need to go back to the reason for this thread.  What you keep going on about is noise - the english court required apple to do...

Quote: Originally Posted by Crowley  But it isn't relevant and affects the context of the court ordered statement.  It's wilfully clouding the intent.  That's the problem, and that's why they're in...