or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Tulkas

Actually, Jacob ordered it in the original trial, as requested by Samsung. In fact the entire UK trial was initiated by Samsung suing Apple for this reason. It was not as a result of or as a response to Apple's appeal. It was the original ruling.    Apple got dinged when Samsung made certain ridiculous and unprecedented suggestions and the Judge bizarrely used them in his ruling. Now that we know the trial was possibly a job interview, his erratic and irrational behavior...
Maybe Samsung can ask Jacob if he knows of any other UK judges that are for sale that would be willing to actively volunteer to take the case. I'm sure other judges would like to know they have a cushy parachute to walk into after the trial.
BAM.   Do you need to look up the word 'rumor'? BAM. They don't mean shit most of the time. But BAM they give haters wood, so there you go.
    Agreed on both of these.
I would think so as well. Hopefully whatever Intel negotiated with the studios and networks can be improved upon when it's Apple turn.
So, um, why not sell the charging unit with just USB connects so the customer can bring whatever cables they want? Hell, it might be a tidy side business to sell Lightening, 30Pin and MicroUSB cables that are compatible with their cable retraction system. No problem making just cables, right? That would be all that needed Apple's licensing. So, make the cables, with license and sell the unit and cables separately. Permanently attached cables seem like a deal killer for...
And Qualcomm's followup to that letter:     Looks like Qualcomm's law firm just lost a client.
I was thinking she looked awfully manly, then read about the name change. Makes perfect sense. Also good to see Apple making moved to improve security.
As a Canadian, I hope this means AWS for HSPA but the realist in me knows that it doesn't.
They didn't license them or have patent protection from Google. Google 'loaned' them to HTC, that is they gave them to HTC to use in lawsuits against Apple. This was done specifically because of the weakness of HTC's patent portfolio. HTC was stuck in a difficult position. The patents they held were determined to be essentially useless in their battle with Apple. If they are SEP, that is an unproven offensive weapon and if they weren't, there is no indication Apple was...
New Posts  All Forums: