Posts by smalM

Quote: Originally posted by cuneglasus I am just going to leave it at that,I think I'm getting repetative and I'm sure there is something more interesting for you guys to read. Checked the forum - no

Quote: Originally posted by Zapchud I too cry for redesign. I'm fine with 2 drives and don't need RAID. Why should 90% of the buyers pay for something you or Matsu think to need? Stop whining about Apple not to build <<put...

Quote: Originally posted by Zapchud The Power 5 is supposed to be 4 times faster than the original Power 4, not per clock. IBM stated the Power5 will be 4 times as fast as the Power4 when it was introduced. The statement related to...

Quote: Originally posted by rickag Another reference to the 47 watt figure. This is the same reference quide as above only presented in another way. The numbers in the Performance section are the same as those from the MPF 2002....

Quote: Originally posted by THT [B]Collated and extrapolated for you viewing pleasure. Just dumped my post reading your table Two remarks: - I think the maximum numbers for the 970 are higher. This chips has to handle much...

Quote: Originally posted by kupan787 I remember reading that a 1.2GHz 970 only used 19 W. So I highly doubt that a 1.3 GHz part would use 50W. 1.2 GHz 970 19W @ 1.1V typical 1.3 GHz 970 30W @ 1.3V typical TYPICAL The...

Quote: Originally posted by Programmer And at roughly the same clock rate it appears they have roughly the same power consumption (20W @ ~1.3 GHz). 970: 30W typical n.n. maximum 7457: 19W typical 26W maximum I wouldn't call...

I'm so envious! Clive will be able to carry around two G5 all day long and I will hardly be able to afford one of them. Perhaps Apple even will enclose styptic pads for him?

Quote: Originally posted by snoopy It is my impression that Windows NT was developed to get away from DOS. Versions up to at least Windows 98 ran on top of DOS. Microsoft hired someone from DEC (I think) to work on it. He had...

Quote: Originally posted by THT These numbers don't seem to make sense. Power consumption scales by the square of the ratio of the two voltages. Given 15.8 W at 1.3 V, a 1.1 V 7457 should be around 11.3 W. So one of the reported...