Posts by Crowley

Quote: Originally Posted by Tulkas  Are all references you don't agree with unsatisfactory? They clearly state, in the very first paragraph that they are referring to the UK judges. The quotation marks designates...

Quote: Originally Posted by Tulkas  Note the basically identical use of quotations in the first sentence. Even though they don't hold your hand and explicitly clarify who exactly said those words, the sentence is...

That is an unsatisfactory reference; it's not clear who is saying that, or what it refers to.  Hardly just cause for criticising the entire legal process and integrity of the judges.     Better luck next time.

Quote: Originally Posted by Tulkas  I ask simple questions which you guys don't seem to be able to answer...   It is unbecoming for them to instead make up reasons, like Apple making false statements,...

Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil    They've been doing it for years.   No they haven't.  Trading Standards don't interfere with subjective superlatives, only factual claims,...

Where did the court claim Apple provided false information?

But it isn't relevant and affects the context of the court ordered statement.  It's wilfully clouding the intent.  That's the problem, and that's why they're in trouble.

Quote: Originally Posted by Tulkas  Simple question: Did a german court find that Samsung infringed?   Doesn't matter if they did, wholly irrelevant to the ruling, to the court-ordered statement, and to...

Quote: Originally Posted by Tulkas        In other words you completely made up the part about the ruling saying nothing more and nothing less. They were instructed what the notice had...

You haven't even got the judge's name right there, let alone that final summation of what's happened.  Can you provide evidence that a judge called Apple's statement untrue and/or incorrect, and the context of why they said that?